|
Q |
Why Choose
FTTH (Fiber To The Home) ?
|
| |
ü
The community looks
better. The streetscape isn't cluttered with ugly communication
pedestals.
ü
It doesn't use or
conduct electricity, supporting our "green" building platform.
ü
Those residents
with the right equipment enjoy more vibrant television.
ü
It supports faster
Internet access, file sharing and downloads.
ü
It enables
economical bundling of services.
ü
It increases
property values. By industry estimates, properties that have
direct fiber-to-the-home are valued $5,000 to $9,400 more than
similar properties that do not.
ü
It offers multiple
benefits to all generations of homebuyers
ü
And services can be
ready at move-in, unlike most telephone and cable companies.
ü
It is far more
reliable than coaxial cable
|
|
Q |
What is
fiber-to-the-premise (fttp) or fiber-to-the-home (ftth) ?
|
| A |
Fiber-to-the-home (FTTP) the delivery of a
communications signal over optical fiber from the operator’s
switching equipment all the way to a home or business,
thereby replacing existing copper infrastructure such as
telephone wires and coaxial cable. Fiber-to-the-premise is a
relatively new and fast-growing method of providing vastly
higher bandwidth to consumers, and thereby enabling more robust
video, internet and voice services.
|
|
Q |
What is
optical fiber ?
|
| A |
Optical fiber uses light instead of electricity to
carry a signal. It is unique because it can carry high bandwidth
signals over long distances without degradation. Copper can also
carry high bandwidth, but only for a few hundred yards – after
which the signal begins to degrade and bandwidth narrows.
Optical fiber has been used in communications networks for more than 30
years, mostly to carry traffic from city to city or country to
country.
|
|
Q |
Why is
fiber optic cable now being connected directly to homes and
businesses?
|
| A |
Connecting homes/businesses directly to
fiber optic cable enables enormous improvements in the bandwidth
that can be provided to consumers. While DSL and cable modems
generally provide transmission speeds of up to five megabits per
second on the download (and are generally slower when
uploading), current fiber optic technology can provide two-way
transmission speeds of up to 100 megabits per second.
Further, while cable and DSL providers are
struggling to squeeze small increments of higher bandwidth out
of their technologies, ongoing improvements in fiber optic
equipment are constantly increasing available bandwidth without
having the change the fiber. That’s why fiber networks are said
to be “future proof.”
|
|
Q |
Why do we
need all that bandwidth? Aren’t cable and DSL systems good
enough for what most people want to do?
|
| A |
If all you want to do is surf web pages,
download a few songs, send and receive some photographs, or
watch streaming video at current picture quality levels, then
the bandwidth provided by today’s cable modems and DSL lines is
probably good enough.
But the world is moving toward vastly higher bandwidth
applications. Companies like Netflix, Amazon and Wal Mart are
preparing to offer feature length movies for download. More
people are looking to upload their own home movies into emails
or web pages.
Consumer electronics companies are coming out with
devices that connect televisions to the Internet.
High-definition video is fast becoming the state-of-the-art –
and one high definition movie takes up as much bandwidth as
35,000 web pages. All of these applications – and many others we
haven’t even dreamed of yet – are going to require much greater
bandwidth than what is generally available today, even from
so-called “broadband” providers.
|
|
Q |
But it was
only a few years ago that I upgraded from dial-up to DSL. Are
you telling me I’m going to have to upgrade again?
|
| A |
Think about it. A little more than two years
ago, the Internet video service You Tube didn’t even exist.
Today, You Tube viewers watch 100 million video clips a day. It
was the advance from dialup to DSL and cable modem that made You
Tube possible. And now a growing number of Americans are
watching their favorite television programs and news and
sporting events over the Internet.
We have no reason to believe these innovations
will stop. This trend will continue into high-definition video,
telemedicine, distance learning, telecommuting and many other
broadband applications that have thus far been limited only by
the amount of high-bandwidth connections into people’s homes.
Only fiber-to-the-home can deliver the bandwidth we are going to
need in the future. Fiber-to-the-premise providers are now
providing this higher capacity at competitive prices.
|
|
Q |
Why can’t I
get these high-bandwidth applications with DSL or cable modem?
|
| A |
DSL and cable modem rely on copper wire to
deliver signals to your home – and copper can deliver high
bandwidth only over very short distances. That’s fine if you
happen to live a few hundred yards from your provider’s
switching station, but most people don’t.
Optical fiber does not have this limitation and thus
is able to carry high bandwidth signals over great distances to
homes and businesses. Only fiber-to-the-premise can deliver the
immense bandwidth that the applications of the future will
require.
|
|
Q |
I’ve heard
that wireless technologies like WiFi and WiMAX can deliver the
same kind of service as fiber-to-the-premise without having to
go through the trouble of installing new wires into homes. Is
this true?
|
| A |
No. Wireless broadband is subject to spectrum availability – the
cost of which limits the bandwidth, and hence the applications
it can provide. The wireless technologies cannot deliver high
definition television – and, in fact, they have trouble
delivering standard television. And HDTV is only one of the many
high-broadband applications now being developed for our
broadband future.
|
|
Q |
Is
fiber-to-the-premise service affordable?
|
| A |
Fiber-to-the-premise services are being
rolled out nationwide at prices that are competitive with video,
voice and data services being delivered by incumbent carriers.
In places where consumers have previously had little or no
choice in their video and Internet services, the addition of a
fiber-to-the-premise competitor has helped keep prices down and
lift service quality.
|
|
Q |
How many
homes are hooked up directly to fiber networks?
|
| A |
As of March 2007, 1.34 million U.S. homes
were the number of homes in the U.S. now receiving video, data
and voice services over direct fiber optic connections. The
number of fiber-to-the-premise subscribers has doubled over each
of the last two years.
|
|
Q |
What
percentage of internet subscribers are getting their service
through fiber-to-the-premise systems?
|
| A |
The construction of fiber-to-the-premise
systems began in earnest only in the last three or four years,
and today about 1.2% of households are connected with fiber.
Only about half of all U.S. households have any form of
broadband connectivity.
|
|
Q |
Is there a
calculated value of having a fiber-connected business?
|
| A
|
Yes. A recent study by RVA & Associates, a
Tulsa-based consulting firm, surveyed home buyers and
developers. It found that fiber-to-the-premise adds about $5,000
to the purchase price of an individual dwelling.
|
|
Q |
How does
the U.S. compare internationally in terms of
fiber-to-the-premise connections?
|
| A
|
Japan is a world leader, with nearly eight
million fiber-to-the-premise connections. South Korea and many
European nations also lead the U.S. in the number of homes
connected directly to fiber networks. However, the U.S. now
leads all these countries in annual growth in the number of
connections.
|
|
Q |
Where in
the U.S. are the fiber-to-the-premise subscribers located ?
|
| A
|
Verizon, the nation’s largest provider of
fiber-to-the-premise service, has wired up nearly 900,000 homes,
mostly in the Northeast, mid-Atlantic, Indiana, Florida, Texas
and California.
More than three dozen municipalities and local public
utilities across the U.S. have built their own fiber networks.
Many developers of new residential communities are wiring up
their new developments with fiber.
Many FTTH subscribers across the nation are getting
their service from small rural telephone companies, medium-sized
telephone service providers, cable companies, and private
facilities-based competitive local exchange carriers.
|
|
Q |
What are
the regulations on fiber-to-the-premise? Do companies have to
have government approvals to wire up homes and neighborhoods?
|
| A
|
Yes. Because they typically carry video
services and thereby compete directly with incumbent cable
television providers, fiber-to-the-premise providers normally
must comply with state and local regulations governing the cable
television industry.
Most states leave it to municipalities and/or county
governments to issue video franchises. And, while federal law
requires local governments to allow competition, in many cases
the strictures placed on new entrants are too onerous to enable
them to take the financial risk of building a new system.
Accordingly, about a dozen states have streamlined their video
franchising processes, and it’s in these states where the bulk
of fiber-to-the-premise deployments are occurring.
A study done in Texas showed that, after that state
streamlined its video franchising process, video-enable
fiber-to-the-premise deployments grew eight times faster there
than in the rest of the country.
|
|
Q |
The last
time fiber lines were installed in my city, some ten or 12 years
ago, the streets were dug up for months. Is that going to happen
again as fiber-to-the-premise networks are built?
|
| A
|
The technology for drilling and burying
cable has changed a lot over the past decade. Contractors can
now use horizontal drilling techniques, where underground
conduits are installed at a single entry point and special
equipment runs them to their destinations without having to dig
open trenches.
Sometimes fiber can be put in existing ducts, water
pipes, sewers and gas lines. And many network builders use
“aerial” fiber that is installed on poles along with existing
telephone, electric and cable wiring.
|
|
Q |
Is
fiber-to-the-premise primarily a technology for getting
high-definition movies on demand?
|
| A |
Not at all. While the vastly higher
bandwidth and transmission speeds offered by
fiber-to-the-premise is certainly enabling video providers to
offer a wider range of products and services, users of other
applications will benefit as well.
Gamers will get access to more powerful multi-player
applications. Avenues will open for distance learning and
telemedicine. Opportunities for telecommuting and working at
home will increase. And, just as Internet applications and
solutions have grown more sophisticated with the expansion of
available bandwidth thus far, you can be sure that this leap
into next-generation broadband will inspire further innovations
that we cannot even imagine at this point.
|
|
We all know that
FTTH matters to subscribers and to network operators.
|
| A |
|
|
Q |
The last
time fiber lines were installed in my city, some ten or 12 years
ago, the streets were dug up for months. Is that going to happen
again as fiber-to-the-premise networks are built?
|
| A |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|